Reports, composed from the record itself.
Two outputs. A single-scale PDF for every administered scale. And, at the Integrated tier, a full assessment report composed from the entire record — each sentence citing its origin.
One scale, one PDF. One record, one report.
Every administered scale produces a self-contained PDF — the result, the descriptor band and a brief interpretation, signed by the clinician. The integrated report sits on top of that: it composes findings across the whole record into a structured draft for the clinician to refine.
Scale PDF
Included in every tierReport draft
Available on the Integrated tierEach sentence carries its source with it.
The integrated draft composes findings from every input on the record. Hover any highlighted clinical statement to see the material it was built from. Edit, approve, or rewrite at the section level — the clinician's hand stays on every word that leaves the platform.
Neuropsychological assessment · draft
Background
The patient is a 63-year-old right-handed retired engineer referred by the GP for cognitive assessment following a six-month history of word-finding difficulty. His daughter, who accompanies him to appointments, reports a clear change over the same period, and her response on the informant scale was IQCODE-SF mean 3.4.
Cognitive profile
Verbal memory was reduced relative to the premorbid estimate, with delayed recall z = −1.4 on the HVLT-R. Confrontation naming and verbal fluency were within expected limits. Executive function and processing speed were within average range. Performance fluctuated across the session, with attention noticeably weaker in the second hour, consistent with the patient's report of late-afternoon worsening.
Mood and behaviour
Self-report indicated mild depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 = 8), in keeping with retained insight into recent change. There were no current indicators of risk on screening; the clinician will continue to monitor.
The same finding, written for the audience.
Choose the audience for each section. BrainScribe adjusts vocabulary, hedging, quantitative density and length — without altering the clinical facts beneath. The clinician approves the final wording in every register.
The patient shows a memory profile reduced relative to predicted, with delayed recall in the low-average range. Other cognitive domains are within expected limits for age and education. Fatigue across the session was clinically apparent and may have lowered performance in the second hour.
I would recommend a follow-up in six months, and earlier review if functional change is noted. No urgent referral indicated at this time.
Three stages, held by the clinician.
Composition is a sequence — assemble the inputs, draft each section, review and approve. The clinician interrupts the sequence at any point, and the draft holds whatever state they leave it in.
Inputs gathered
Every artefact on the assessment record is pulled into the composition workspace and tagged with its source: scale, score, transcript timestamp or clinician note.
Sections composed
Each section is drafted from its assembled inputs, with provenance preserved. Findings refer to the underlying material so the clinician can verify before approving.
Section-by-section
The clinician edits, requests a rewrite, or replaces any section. Approval is granular — the report can ship with partial approval or wait until the full draft is signed off.
The everyday output. One scale, one page.
Each completed scale produces a clean, self-contained PDF. The result, the descriptor band, the normative citation and a short interpretation — signed by the clinician. Useful as an artefact in its own right, or as material for a broader assessment.
Self-report screen · depression symptoms
Interpretation
The patient endorsed symptoms in the mild range for depression severity. There was no endorsement of item 9 (self-harm or suicidal ideation). The pattern is consistent with reactive low mood; further enquiry into recent life events is indicated where clinically appropriate.
Norm & scoring
Score derived from item sum (0–27). Severity bands per Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2001. PHQ-9 is a screening tool; diagnosis is a clinical decision.
Clinician note
Discussed at the in-clinic appointment on 25 Mar 2026. Patient reports mood change linked to retirement and physical decline. Will review at next session.
Self-contained
One scale per file. The PDF contains everything a referrer needs to read the result without context-switching back to the platform.
Cited norms
Score derivation and severity-band citation visible on every page. The PDF stands on its own as a clinical artefact.
Clinician-signed
A scale PDF is released only after clinician approval. AHPRA number and signature line carry through to the final document.
Composable
Available to the integrated draft as a source. Findings from a single-scale PDF re-enter the larger report when the clinician chooses to compose it.
Eight sample reports, straight from the engine.
These are real PDFs produced by the BrainScribe scoring and interpretation engine — not mockups. Synthetic clinical scenarios, real scoring logic, real rendering. The single-scale PDF described above is what each one looks like; the integrated report sits on top of this output for the closed-beta release.
Moderate depression with Item 9 endorsement
Severity band, depression-symptom profile, and the safety-precedence override that fires when Item 9 (self-harm or suicidal ideation) is endorsed — a structural rule, not a sentiment guess.
Moderate anxiety
Severity band with anxiety-symptom profile classification (cognitive, somatic, mixed) and reliable-change / MCID descriptors for serial review.
BPSD across multiple domains
Twelve-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Questionnaire) with severity and distress on separate axes, MANDATORY_REVIEW alerts for psychosis and aggression, and per-domain severity breakdowns.
Threshold met for likely cognitive decline
Sixteen-item informant cognitive-decline screen with population-stratified cut-points. The same raw score is interpreted differently in community vs memory-clinic populations — the report shows which.
Severe sleepiness with driving safety alert
Epworth Sleepiness Scale with the driving-safety override that fires at threshold — visible top-of-report, not buried in a footnote. The kind of risk flag a tribunal will look for.
Moderate depression with cognitive features
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, ten items, clinician-administered. Four engine-formulated domains (mood, somatic, cognitive, anhedonia) shown as subscale panels alongside the headline severity.
Probable PTSD with mixed cluster elevation
Twenty-item PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, with the four DSM-5 cluster subscales (intrusion, avoidance, negative cognitions/mood, arousal/reactivity) shown as published Weathers 2013 panels and the overall PCL-5 cut-point.
Moderate-to-severe carer burden
Zarit Burden Interview, short form. Strain-balance gating means the engine only reports the "balanced burden" narrative for actual balanced profiles — strain-dominant cases get strain-dominant prose.
Each PDF carries the audit footer the engine emits: interpretation-library version, fragment count, REVIEW_REQUIRED status at sign-off, generation timestamp. The synthetic patient identifier (A8C2 and similar) and the demographic context are illustrative.
One template per kind of report you write.
Each template defines its sections, the inputs each section is composed from, and the export format. Click any template for the full section breakdown.
CognitiveNeuropsychological›
Full cognitive profile with premorbid estimate, domain summary, and clinician-formulated impression.
- Referral & background
- Behavioural observations
- Premorbid estimate
- Cognitive profile by domain
- Mood & behaviour
- Functional impact
- Impression
- Recommendations
LegalCapacity›
Decision-specific capacity assessment with functional findings and qualified opinion.
- Referral & specific decision in question
- Cognitive findings
- Functional capacity · decision-relevant abilities
- Risk & mitigation
- Opinion
DevelopmentalADHD›
DSM-5-TR aligned ADHD assessment incorporating self/informant scales and developmental history.
- Developmental & family history
- Symptom presentation across settings
- Self & informant scale results
- Differential considerations
- Diagnostic impression
- Recommendations & treatment
DevelopmentalDevelopmental›
Paediatric or adolescent assessment with parent and teacher informant streams.
- Developmental history
- Cognitive profile
- Academic functioning
- Adaptive functioning
- Behavioural & emotional profile
- Formulation
- Recommendations
LegalMedico-legal›
Independent report with referral question, methodology and qualified opinion to a brief.
- Referral question & instructions
- Methodology & sources reviewed
- Background
- Findings by domain
- Causation & contribution
- Qualified opinion
FunctionalNDIS functional›
NDIS-aligned functional capacity report with daily-living implications and reasonable adjustments.
- Participant context
- Cognitive profile
- Daily-living impact
- Supports & reasonable adjustments
- Goals & review
Join the closed beta.
AHPRA registration required · 5 free assessments / month · No credit card · Cancel any time.