Closed beta · waitlist BrainScribe is pre-launch. AHPRA-registered specialists practising in Australia — join the first cohort
BrainScribeai
OverviewFor neuropsychology

For the neuropsychologist whose report can be tendered.

A cognitive battery, premorbid estimates, informant scales and an audit trail that holds together in tribunal. Every score in the draft links back to its norm citation, its stratum and its raw entry.

Performance tests30+Wechsler, CVLT-3, HVLT-R, BVMT-R, Trails, COWAT, Boston
Norm rows8,958Age × education × sex strata where available
Informant scales12NPI-Q, IQCODE-SF, AD8, FAQ, Lawton, ZBI-12, FBI, CBI-R, BEHAVE-AD, DAD, CSDD, MFS
Audit footerEvery pageInterpretation library · fragment count · REVIEW_REQUIRED status · generation time
Why BrainScribe for neuropsychology

Built around the work a tribunal can examine.

Neuropsychological reports are read by referrers, lawyers, judges, NDIS planners and DBS surgical teams. Each will, at some point, ask where a score came from. The platform was built so that the answer is always one click away.

01

Named norms, named strata.

Raw scores convert against the dataset that fits the patient. Source, sample size, stratum and scoring direction stay attached to every conversion. Reverse-scored measures (time, errors) are inverted before they enter a draft.

02

Premorbid estimates that show their working.

Education-based, NART-based, demographic regressions. The platform records which method produced the estimate and how it compares to the observed profile. Discrepancy reasoning stays on the record.

03

An audit trail that survives subpoena.

Every section of every draft carries an interpretation-library version, a fragment count, a REVIEW_REQUIRED status and a generation timestamp. The clinician's review and approval timestamps are recorded against each fragment. If a clause is queried in a tribunal, its origin is named.

04

Reliable-change for serial review.

For repeat administrations on PHQ-9, GAD-7 and other supported measures, the platform computes reliable-change (RCI) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) against published references. Change descriptors reflect measurement, not impression.

05

Session, scribe and report — one workspace. Planned for closed beta

The integrated-session surface bundles appointment scheduling, electronic consent (telehealth, recording, transcript — each independently revocable), browser-based video, audio-only or audio + video recording, and identified-speaker transcript routing into the same record the report draft is built from. The video layer follows a publisher-licence-style integration pattern — on the roadmap, not in production. See the integrated session page →

Scales and tests you'll use

What's live in the library today.

Twenty-four questionnaires are implemented in the engine across cognitive, behavioural, functional and mood domains. The performance-test catalogue runs on two tiers: BrainScribe scores tests with published normative literature (Trail Making, COWAT, Animal Fluency, BNT, RCFT, Stroop, MoCA, NART, Bells, Pegboard); for tests with publisher-proprietary norms (WAIS, WMS, CVLT, BVMT-R, HVLT-R, D-KEFS), the clinician scores using their own licensed materials and enters the result — BrainScribe records provenance and integrates the value into the draft.

Informant cognitive and behavioural

IQCODE-SFShort-form informant cognitive decline screen; cut-points stratified by population
AD8Eight-item informant dementia screen, brief and well-validated
NPI-QNeuropsychiatric Inventory (Questionnaire), with MANDATORY_REVIEW alerts for psychosis, aggression and severity at threshold
FBIFrontal Behavioural Inventory, frontotemporal screen
CBI-RCambridge Behavioural Inventory (Revised), FTD profiles
BEHAVE-ADBehavioural pathology in Alzheimer's Disease
CSDDCornell Scale for Depression in Dementia

Functional and carer

FAQFunctional Activities Questionnaire
Lawton-IADLInstrumental activities of daily living
DADDisability Assessment for Dementia
ZBI-12Zarit Burden Interview, carer burden

Mood, sleep, fatigue and worry

PHQ-9 · GAD-7Depression and anxiety severity, with RCI / MCID for serial review
PSWQPenn State Worry Questionnaire
ESS · ISISleepiness and insomnia, with driving-safety and clinical-insomnia thresholds
FSS · MFIS · MFS · MSIS-29Fatigue and impact, cross-condition and MS-specific

Performance tests · scored against published literature

Trail Making A/BTombaugh, 2004 — age × education stratified, time-direction inversion handled
COWAT · Animal FluencyTombaugh et al., 1999 — phonemic and category fluency
Boston Naming TestTombaugh & Hubley, 1997; Heaton et al., 2004 — confrontation naming
RCFTKnight et al., 2006 (Australian); Spreen & Strauss compendium — visuoconstruction
Stroop (classic)Lucas et al., 2005 Mayo Older Americans; Spreen & Strauss compendium
MoCA · NARTRossetti, 2011; Christensen, 2011 — screening and premorbid (AU norms preferred)
Bells Cancellation · Grooved PegboardMancuso et al., 2019; Heaton et al., 2004 — attention and motor

Performance tests · clinician scores, BrainScribe integrates

WAIS-IVPearson; clinician enters raw + scaled — Digit Span, Coding, Symbol Search, full-scale where administered
WMS-IV Logical MemoryPearson; clinician enters raw + scaled per published age stratum
CVLT-3Pearson; clinician enters raw + T-scores from publisher scoring
HVLT-R · BVMT-RPAR; clinician enters raw + T-scores per Brandt & Benedict / Benedict
D-KEFS subtestsPearson; clinician enters scaled scores; provenance preserved against the named subtest

The performance-test catalogue is documented in full on the performance tests page, with norm citations, sample sizes and reverse-direction handling per measure.

Coming next · scoped + in build

Condition-specific scales expanding monthly.

Parkinson's disease

PDQ-39, PD-CFRS — quality-of-life and cognitive-functional reporting for routine review and DBS candidacy workups.

Epilepsy

QOLIE-31 — quality-of-life in epilepsy, with the seizure-worry and emotional-wellbeing subscales mapped through the report draft.

Multiple sclerosis

MSNQ self + informant, alongside MSIS-29 and MFIS already live. Cognitive-screening and disease-impact framed for routine MS review.

TBI & ABI outcome

EBIQ self + relative, plus cognitive-communication measures (LCQ, CETI-M) so ABI cohorts can be assessed across cognitive, behavioural and communication domains.

Huntington's disease

HDQoL — first patient-reported outcome measure designed for HD; supports pre-clinical and manifest stages.

Social cognition

IRI, QCAE, TEQ — empathy and social-cognitive measures for FTD, ASD and TBI workups, with self and informant variants where validated.

Scoped against the eight-stocktake non-paid scale library — over 130 candidate measures across memory, executive function, language and cognitive-communication, attention, social cognition, visual-spatial, condition-specific, and syndrome-specific domains. Changelog tracks what shipped; priorities can be requested by beta clinicians.

A typical workflow

From referral to integrated impression.

01

Open the referral. Anchor the question.

Referrer details, the clinical question and any prior reports attach to the assessment record. The question, capacity, DBS candidacy, dementia spectrum, post-acute review, medico-legal opinion, shapes which scales and tests are pre-populated.

02

Estimate premorbid functioning.

The platform records the premorbid method (education-based, NART, demographic regression) and the resulting estimate. The discrepancy with observed performance is computed at the domain level once the battery is in.

03

Administer the battery. Enter raw scores.

Wechsler, CVLT-3, HVLT-R, BVMT-R, Trails, COWAT, Boston Naming and the rest are entered raw. Scaled, T, z and percentile compute live against the chosen stratum. Reconciliation tolerance surfaces silent inconsistencies before they reach the draft.

04

Add informant scales. Compose the domain profile.

IQCODE-SF, NPI-Q, FAQ, Lawton-IADL, ZBI-12 and the rest are sent by self-completion link to the informant. Once they return, the domain profile compiles across attention, memory, executive, language and visuospatial.

05

Compose the integrated impression. Review. Sign.

The draft composes from scales, performance scores, observations, the interview transcript and the premorbid estimate. Audience and depth are set, GP letter, NDIS, specialist, medico-legal. Every page carries the audit footer. The clinician edits, approves and signs.

For medico-legal work

An audit trail on every page.

Each exported report carries a per-page footer naming the interpretation library version, the count of fragments composed, the REVIEW_REQUIRED status at sign-off and the generation timestamp. If a clause is queried in court or in a tribunal, the origin is named.

Footer present on every exported page
Interpretation libraryv0.5.1
Fragments composed142
REVIEW_REQUIRED at signNone
Generated2026-05-18 14:22 AEST

If a clause is queried at hearing, the platform can produce the source fragment, the score that anchored it, and the timestamp at which the clinician approved the wording.

Audit footer · every exported page
What it isn't

The boundaries that stay locked.

  • Not a diagnostic tool. The platform scores against named norms and drafts interpretation. The clinician forms the opinion.
  • Not a replacement for clinical judgement. Premorbid-observed discrepancy, profile congruence, effort and embedded validity, all remain the clinician's call.
  • Not a forensic certification. BrainScribe supports medico-legal work; it does not certify reports for any particular jurisdiction.
  • Not a medical device. BrainScribe is not registered as a medical device under Australian law.
  • Not trained on patient data. Patient content is not used to train any model, BrainScribe's or anyone else's.

Join the closed beta.

AHPRA registration required · 5 free assessments / clinician / month · No credit card · Founding-member rate locked in for life.

Request beta access → Talk to the team